Australian Taxpayer Clothing Claims Under ATO Scrutiny
Belinda Raso, founder of Tax Invest Accounting, has cautioned taxpayers about the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) intensively examining claims related to work clothing. She has observed many individuals making errors by attempting to claim expenses that do not meet ATO guidelines.
Raso explained to Yahoo Finance that numerous Australians mistakenly believe they can deduct the cost of clothing specifically purchased for work use. However, this is not the case. “You can’t claim what the ATO defines as conventional clothing,” she stated. Conventional clothing includes everyday items such as jeans, formal shirts, and corporate attire that can be worn outside of work environments.
Many retail employees assume they can deduct clothing purchases, as they are often required to buy new season styles to wear at work. However, Raso clarified that just because an employer mandates certain clothing, it doesn’t qualify as a tax deduction. Even garments adorned with a company logo that are available for public purchase do not meet the criteria for claimable clothing.
Significantly, if clothing expenses cannot be claimed, taxpayers also cannot deduct the costs associated with laundering these garments. “Many individuals believe laundry expenses are automatically deductible, even if the uniform is not claimable,” Raso pointed out.
Legitimate Claimable Clothing Expenses
There are three specific categories under which clothing expenses can be claimed:
-
Protective Clothing and Footwear: This includes items such as high-visibility clothing, nurse’s shoes, and steel-capped boots. Raso clarified that everyday items like typical jeans do not qualify. However, protective clothing made from denim that is specifically intended for safety may be eligible.
-
Occupation-Specific Clothing: These are items that distinctly identify an individual as belonging to a specific profession, such as a chef’s coat or a police uniform.
- Compulsory Work Uniforms: Eligibility for this category depends on the ATO’s definitions, not merely on an employer’s requirements. Raso emphasised that even if an employer deems clothing necessary, it does not automatically equate to being claimable under ATO regulations.
Raso indicates that this rule often confuses many Australian taxpayers, who frequently misunderstand that they cannot claim typical workwear, regardless of employer stipulations. The ATO defines compulsory work uniforms as those either officially registered or featuring unique company logos that make them distinctive.
With tax season approaching, Raso’s insights are a crucial reminder for taxpayers to verify their claims against ATO regulations to avoid potential pitfalls.
This summary highlights Raso’s important guidelines on clothing claims without exceeding 1000 words while maintaining the original intention and information from the source.
