Table of Contents
Qubic’s Controversial Mining Target on Dogecoin
Qubic, a project spearheaded by Sergey Ivancheglo, popularly known as Come-from-Beyond, has ignited discussions within the cryptocurrency community, particularly with its recent intentions to target Dogecoin (DOGE) for a coordinated mining effort following a community vote. This initiative aims to gain majority hashrate control, reminiscent of a previous campaign directed at Monero (XMR), where Qubic claimed a successful 51% attack that resulted in a chain reorganisation and a subsequent price drop for Monero.
Following the announcement, Dogecoin’s price experienced a noticeable decline. As of the latest data from CoinGecko, DOGE is trading at approximately US$0.22 (AU$0.34), reflecting a 5.1% decrease over the past 24 hours. This response underlines the inherent vulnerabilities faced by Proof-of-Work (PoW) chains, particularly regarding their exposure to economic incentives that can lead to the centralisation of mining power.
The Community’s Decision and Its Implications
In a move that has sparked intense debate, Ivancheglo sought input from the community about which PoW blockchain should be the next target, with options including Kaspa, Zcash, and any other ASIC-mined coins. Dogecoin overwhelmingly received support, garnering over 300 votes—more than the total received by all other networks combined. Ivancheglo announced the outcome on X, confirming, “The Qubic community has chosen Dogecoin.”
The architect of this controversial strategy suggested that the objective is to address questions regarding blockchain resilience, implying that Qubic may possess tools capable of strengthening the integrity of blockchain networks.
As a consequence of Qubic’s announcement, Dogecoin has seen a negative market impact, indicating the fragility of PoW systems when faced with potential threats from concentrated mining activities.
Echoes of the Monero Takeover
Earlier in the month, Qubic executed a similar strategy against Monero, capturing over half of the network’s hashrate. This act not only resulted in a blockchain reorganisation but also raised significant concerns about the stability and integrity of established PoW systems. The swift action taken by exchanges, such as Kraken, which froze Monero deposits due to "potential risk to network integrity" stemming from Qubic’s control over the network, highlights the serious implications of such actions. While trading and withdrawals for Monero remain operational, deposits will remain halted until the exchange deems the network stable once again.
At present, Qubic’s mining pool maintains a hashrate above 1.6 gigahashes per second (GH/s), underscoring their capacity to influence the networks they target significantly.
Conclusion
The recent developments surrounding Qubic’s approach have indeed sparked significant attention towards the vulnerabilities of PoW cryptocurrencies like Dogecoin and Monero. The implications of a concentrated mining effort can destabilise networks and create challenges for exchanges and users alike. As Qubic’s activities continue, the broader cryptocurrency community must remain vigilant in addressing the delicate balance of decentralisation and security inherent in blockchain technologies.
