Table of Contents
For decades, Warren Buffett’s investment philosophy—encompassing the acquisition of quality companies at reasonable prices for long-term holding—has been praised as a blueprint for wealth accumulation by financial media, investment managers, and countless self-help finance publications. With Buffett’s recent retirement from active leadership at Berkshire Hathaway, a wave of tributes and retrospectives is anticipated, with many urging everyday investors to emulate the so-called "Oracle of Omaha."
Buffett famously stated, “When we own portions of outstanding businesses with outstanding managements, our favourite holding period is forever.” However, the sobering truth is that trying to invest like Warren Buffett could be one of the most detrimental choices for the average investor. This isn’t a critique of Buffett’s investment tenets; rather, it’s a stark reminder that the average investor is unlikely to replicate his success.
Buffett’s long tenure in the market has been characterised by a scale, influence, and access that is largely unattainable for retail investors. Many of his most lucrative investments were not sourced from the public markets but emerged from private discussions with high-ranking officials and business leaders. Furthermore, his returns rely not just on disciplined investing, but also on exclusive opportunities, regulatory advantages, and a formidable reputation.
Below are six reasons why emulating Buffett’s approach may be misguided for the typical investor:
1. Insurance Float Advantage (Since 1967)
Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway benefits from billions in insurance float, allowing him to invest substantial amounts without deploying his personal capital. This structure provides a significant compounding advantage that ordinary investors lack. Regular investors must save and tax their money before investing, while Buffett invests other people’s money—pre-tax and at no immediate cost to himself.
2. Tax-Efficient Investment Structures (Since 1967)
Buffett’s strategy of avoiding dividends allows Berkshire Hathaway to retain earnings, enabling tax-efficient compounding over time. Few small investors have the luxury of deferring their cash flow for decades without needing to withdraw to meet living expenses.
3. Asymmetric Upside Through Custom Deals (Since 1967)
Many of Buffett’s investments include special terms such as warrants that provide substantial upside potential coupled with minimal risk. In contrast, average investors are confined to the riskier realm of common stock.
4. Direct Access to Policymakers (1991, 2008–2009)
Buffett has enjoyed access to influential government figures, enabling him to navigate times of economic turmoil more deftly than ordinary investors. Instances such as the Salomon Brothers scandal and the Global Financial Crisis underline how Buffett’s relationships with Treasurers and Presidents helped stabilise firms at pivotal moments.
5. Access to Private Placements and Preferential Treatment (Since 1967)
Buffett often participates in private placements, securing terms that are not available to retail investors. For example, he invested heavily in distressed firms like Goldman Sachs and GE, locked in lucrative terms and yields that everyday investors could not access.
6. Reputation as a Force Multiplier
Buffett’s immense reputation means that merely mentioning his investment in a company can cause stock prices to soar, enhancing his returns further. This kind of market influence is beyond the realm of the average investor, who often shares their transactions only to lack any significant response.
Conclusion: The Reality of Investing
While it is undeniable that Buffett’s investing acumen—characterised by discipline and strategic insight—is exemplary, it is critical to acknowledge that many of his exceptional returns were achieved in the past and rely heavily on factors such as scale and access, rather than solely investment prowess.
The narrative surrounding Buffett’s success can often lead to unrealistic expectations for the average investor. As Buffett exits the stage, a potentially uncritical wave of optimism could mislead everyday investors into believing that mimicking Buffett’s style holds promise when, in reality, the playing field is not level. Reality dictates that Buffett’s unique advantages—his access, reputation, and strategic concerns—cannot be replicated.
This article serves as a cautionary note to investors: the financial landscape is substantially different for "Not Warren Buffetts" like most of us, and what has worked for him does not automatically translate into feasible strategies for seasoned or novice traders alike. Warren Buffett may be an icon, but his methods and the conditions under which he operated are distinctly his own and may not be relevant for those outside his orbit.
